Skip to content

Conversation

@jishnub
Copy link
Member

@jishnub jishnub commented Apr 4, 2025

Constant-propagation of the band index would allow eliminating the branches in setindex! for structured matrices. These parallel the similar getindex definitions that already exist.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.03%. Comparing base (3e525a8) to head (d0d8279).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1259      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.01%   92.03%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines       15500    15540      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits        14262    14302      +40     
  Misses       1238     1238              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jishnub jishnub added arrays [a, r, r, a, y, s] performance Must go faster labels Apr 5, 2025
@jishnub jishnub force-pushed the jishnub/bandindex_setindex branch from dbd4dff to d0d8279 Compare April 12, 2025 06:18
@jishnub jishnub force-pushed the jishnub/bandindex_setindex branch from d0d8279 to 258102f Compare April 23, 2025 12:04
@jishnub jishnub merged commit 88dba5d into master Apr 25, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@jishnub jishnub deleted the jishnub/bandindex_setindex branch April 25, 2025 04:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

arrays [a, r, r, a, y, s] performance Must go faster

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants